Use of AI in debate prep
From time to time we are called on to defend what we believe, especially when it seems to contradict generally accepted views. This brings us into the realm of apologetics, and it's an area in which the average Christian is not experienced, leading to weak arguments and logical fallacies on both sides. One logical fallacy often employed by the naturalistic evolutionist is the faulty appeal to authority. "Most people believe ..." or "Most scientists say ..." is appealing to a majority who either may be faulty in their conclusions or express a preconceived bias against opposing views, thus overlooking weaknesses in their own arguments. One way to prepare for such debates is to do "debate prep" - to examine the arguments of the opposing side alongside our own in order to find the weaknesses in both. One useful feature of AI is getting it to perform an analysis. It should be able to do so without bias or emotional argument, and it is much less likely to re...